tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610803938756668468.post980259756354916101..comments2024-03-28T07:08:58.221-04:00Comments on Todd Seavey: Paterson's DomainTodd Seaveyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08589187886030112999noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610803938756668468.post-19606674759696156432008-03-19T02:52:00.000-04:002008-03-19T02:52:00.000-04:00Never say never — wouldn’t want the universe destr...Never say never — wouldn’t want the universe destroyed over it — but normally, no, abolish the government and thus, clearly, eminent domain, too. Multi-party private contracts of surprising complexity have been used to handle such things in the past.<br><br>And, yes, Paterson is a non-legal matter and (to answer your somewhat off-point questions from two other threads) charity is swell, as you are not the first to notice, St. Wow.Todd Seaveyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08589187886030112999noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610803938756668468.post-48160998904393902612008-03-18T17:49:00.000-04:002008-03-18T17:49:00.000-04:00aren’t there cases in which you’d be for eminent d...aren’t there cases in which you’d be for eminent domain? i think it’s being used way, way too much and in many unfair ways, but there may be exceptions where a govt needs it. it should be used sparingly. <br><br>as for policy mattering over personality – this is about more than personality. spitzer broke the laws that he enforced for everyone else, so you can’t really trust anythign he says anymore. as for patterson and his affairs, that’s a more private matter.Wowhttp://www.jdate.com/noreply@blogger.com