tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610803938756668468.post8673635915418989292..comments2024-03-28T07:08:58.221-04:00Comments on Todd Seavey: Neutron Bombs and Net NeutralityTodd Seaveyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08589187886030112999noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-610803938756668468.post-27370639867040197562010-12-20T14:58:50.454-05:002010-12-20T14:58:50.454-05:00Aren't most net neutrality proponents okay wit...Aren't most net neutrality proponents okay with ISPs charging more for a larger quantity of bits, and less for a smaller quantity? I thought the net neutrality cause was about forbidding ISPs from discriminating for or against bits based on their <em>content</em>. For example, charging more for transporting a Siouxsie and the Banshees album from iTunes to your PC than for transporting a Katy Perry album; or providing slower access to Bing than to Google. Some (most?) net neutrality advocates don't even want to allow ISPs to discriminate among application protocols (e.g., FTP and BitTorrent).Eric Hannekennoreply@blogger.com